Join a community of over , senior developers. I’ve found Selenium to be fairly reliable – places where the tests break down are often indicative of something wrong with the application; or something that is likely to be problematic when the application goes into production. As the lead developer for Canoo WebTest and HtmlUnit, Marc is clearly biased towards this style of tool, which he admits, and asks only that you read his analysis before arguing with him: Sign up using Email and Password. Thank you for participating in the discussion. Finally, Kent Tong imagines bridging the two approaches:
|Date Added:||28 October 2004|
|File Size:||43.70 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Don’t expect that to last long.
But there’s so much more behind being registered. This pop-up will close itself in a few moments.
Maven Repository: it » jwebunit-webdriver-plugin »
John Smith 1 5. HtmlUnit and thus WebTest is just as well up to the task. They are there if wendriver want them but mostly we write functional tests in a DSL that matches the customers domain language typically a layer above interactions with the browser.
Your message is awaiting moderation. Tell us what you think.
For more information, read on about Canoo WebTestSeleniumTesting and the next generation of functional testing tools. Tools like WebTest strike me as being somewhat theoretical – they prove that the code works perfectly, but only in an ideal environment that bears little resemblance to production.
It suffers from a methodological error. But for now they are almost the same except for some minor differences, so I would say it’s a matter of taste and fact that JUnit is more widespread.
I don’t know that it’s possible to simply score testing tools as though it were 13 to 5 or any other simplistic means. Functional testing tools for web applications come in a variety sebdriver styles, but one of the most fundamental differences between the choices are between the tools that drive one or more real web browsers in order to fully recreate a realistic environment, like Selenium, and tools that simulate the way a web-browser operates, like Canoo WebTest.
Trying to be objective, I may overcompensate in the other direction and give Selenium too much credit. If not, what is the best practice to display Selenium testing in the industry?
But Selenium need an another tool to drive jweebunit test scripts. What I really want jwebunir know is whether combining Selenium with JUnit is the best practice to test web application in the industry now. Sign up using Facebook.
WebTest vs. Selenium: Real and Simulated Browser Testing
As the lead developer for Canoo WebTest and HtmlUnit, Marc is clearly biased towards this style of tool, which he admits, and asks only that you read his analysis before arguing with him: Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.
I have seen some tutorials about each one individually ant manualJUnit TutorialSelenium jwebunut and I have understood that JScover just graphically presents you the results of the test. See our privacy notice for details. A suite of unit tests which closely – but do not exactly – simulate the user environment – might better be called “feature tests”.